Search results for research

HCPC research on effective clinical and peer supervision in the workplace

HCPC research on effective clinical and peer supervision in the workplace

This research focuses on registrants and service users with the remit to explore their views on the content and accessibility of the standards.

The second in a series of research reports on the regulation of the health professions registered with the HPC. 

The third report in a series on research in regulation of the professions registered with the HPC.

This research aims to examine available evidence regarding the use and impact of service user feedback tools in healthcare, and explore the views of people within relevant professional bodies.

This report is the fourth in a series on research relating to the professions registered with the HCPC. It is part of our commitment to building the evidence base of regulation and being innovative in our approach. 

This research aims to examine available evidence regarding the use and impact of service user feedback tools in healthcare, and explore the views of people within the relevant professional bodies.

Aim: Learning from data and research to inform our decision making and share insights to protect, promote and maintain the health, safety and well-being of the public

In early 2017, the HCPC commenced a review of the Indicative Sanctions Policy to ensure it is up to date, reflects public opinion, and continues to support fair and proportionate decision making. As part of this review we commissioned market research into the public’s views of the Policy and undertook a public consultation.

Nana-Jane is a registered biomedical scientist currently in the third year of her PhD researching Bladder Cancer.

Search for resource by topic