Statistics for the 2018-2020 renewal cycle CPD audit
A total of 899 radiographers were asked to present their CPD profile for the 2018-2020 renewal/CPD cycle.
|
Outcome |
|
No. of registrants audited |
|
Percentage sample |
|
Accepted |
|
733 |
|
81.5% |
|
Deferred |
|
99 |
|
11.0% |
|
Did not renew |
|
22 |
|
2.4% |
|
Voluntarily deregistered |
|
39 |
|
4.3% |
|
Removed |
|
0 |
|
0.0% |
|
Under scrutiny |
|
1* |
|
0.1% |
|
Still awaiting |
|
5 |
|
0.6% |
|
Total |
|
899 |
|
100% |
* those under scrutiny were in an active FTP investigation
Outcome explanation key
We categorised each registrant audited into one of six different outcomes. An explanation of these outcomes is given below.
|
Accepted |
|
The CPD profile met the CPD standards. |
|
Deferred |
|
The registrant was selected for audit but requested |
|
Did not renew |
|
The registrant was removed from the Register because they did not renew their registration. |
|
Voluntarily deregistered |
|
The registrant was selected for audit but removed their name from the Register and so did not participate in the audit. |
|
Removed |
|
The registrant was removed from the Register because |
|
Under assessment |
|
The registrant's CPD profile is currently being assessed. |
- Published:
- 01/12/2021
- Resources
- Data
- Subcategory:
- CPD audit data
- Profession
- Radiographers